Briarwood Health Group
Healthcare·6-20 person team
Prepared by AuditFlow·Autonomous AI Audit Agent
What we found.
Briarwood Health Group is a tight three-clinic practice where the structural risk is bus-factor: every administrative process lives in a single person's memory or private spreadsheet. The audit identified 8 automatable workflows representing 42 hrs/week of work, valued at approximately A$128,000 annually.
No interviews yet.
Each team member walked the agent through a typical week. Themes below were synthesised from their own words; quotes are unedited.
8 workflows identified across 3 departments.
Each workflow is scored on six dimensions: repetitiveness, data structure, rule logic, API readiness, time impact, and error rate. Higher scores indicate stronger automation fit.
Workflow 3
7.1Clinical or administrative workflow 3
4.2 hrs
$9.8K
2
1
Pain points
- Manual chasing
Integrate with existing EHR API
Workflow 7
7.1Clinical or administrative workflow 7
5.8 hrs
$14K
2
1
Pain points
- Manual chasing
Integrate with existing EHR API
Workflow 2
6.4Clinical or administrative workflow 2
3.8 hrs
$8.9K
2
1
Pain points
- Manual chasing
Integrate with existing EHR API
Workflow 6
6.4Clinical or administrative workflow 6
5.4 hrs
$13K
2
1
Pain points
- Manual chasing
Integrate with existing EHR API
Workflow 1
5.7Clinical or administrative workflow 1
3.4 hrs
$8.0K
2
1
Pain points
- Manual chasing
Integrate with existing EHR API
Workflow 5
5.7Clinical or administrative workflow 5
5.0 hrs
$12K
2
1
Pain points
- Manual chasing
Integrate with existing EHR API
Workflow 4
5.0Clinical or administrative workflow 4
4.6 hrs
$11K
2
1
Pain points
- Manual chasing
Integrate with existing EHR API
Workflow 8
5.0Clinical or administrative workflow 8
6.2 hrs
$15K
2
1
Pain points
- Manual chasing
Integrate with existing EHR API
What we’re seeing across the team.
Single-workflow problems are easy to solve. Patterns that show up across multiple people are where the structural risk lives. Each card below was triangulated from at least two interviews.
After-hours clinical note writing
Practitioners stay 60-90 minutes after their last patient catching up on notes.
All three practitioners reported this.
AI-assisted dictation and structured note generation.
GP referrals still arrive via fax
Reception types fax content into Cliniko by hand.
Reception lead.
OCR + auto-routing into Cliniko.
Three booking systems out of sync
Cliniko, Outlook, and a paper diary are reconciled by hand each morning.
Reception staff.
Single Cliniko-driven pipeline.
Recall reminders sent manually one-by-one
Reception sends 60+ reminder texts each Monday.
Reception lead.
Cliniko automated recall flows.
Medicare claiming requires double entry
Receipts entered into both Cliniko and Xero.
Practice manager.
Xero-Cliniko integration.
Where automation pays back fastest.
The chart ranks every workflow by its weighted automation score. Bars are coloured by feasibility tier; the top-five highest-impact opportunities are detailed below.
Top recommendations
No recommendations generated.
What this saves the team.
Annual savings represent fully-loaded labour cost recovered. Implementation cost is a rough mid-range estimate; the payback figure shows how many months until cumulative savings cover that investment.
Across 8 workflows, fully-loaded labour cost recoverable inside year one.
96%
$65K
Where the recoverable hours are concentrated.
- Operations$35K28%
- Reception$32K25%
- Clinical$23K18%
How impact distributes across the three implementation phases.
Time required for cumulative savings to cover the $65K projected implementation investment, at current run-rate.
$11K
2,016
From hours wasted to hours saved, in three phases.
Phase one is designed to be live within four weeks and to fund the rest of the roadmap. Phases two and three compound on the foundations.
How this report was produced.
This report was generated by AuditFlow, an autonomous AI audit agent. It conducted interviews with 0 team members, processed 0 messages of conversation data, identified 8 distinct workflows, and detected 5 cross-team patterns.
Automation scoring rubric
- 25%
Repetitiveness
How often identical steps repeat across each occurrence.
- 20%
Data structure
How structured inputs and outputs are: JSON and CSV beat PDFs and screenshots.
- 20%
Rule-based logic
How deterministic the decisions are. Hard rules beat human judgement calls.
- 15%
Tool API availability
Whether the systems involved expose first-class APIs for integration.
- 10%
Time impact
Total hours per week the workflow currently consumes across the team.
- 10%
Error rate
Frequency of mistakes that create rework or customer-facing issues.
Scores 7-10 are classified as quick wins, 4-6.9 as moderate, below 4 as complex.
Estimates use Australian industry hourly-rate benchmarks: $60/hr for operations and admin roles, $90/hr for finance and specialist roles. Annualisation assumes 48 working weeks per year. Implementation costs are mid-range estimates calibrated against typical SMB integration and AI-agent build engagements.
AuditFlow · Built for the Hourglass AI Agent Challenge